The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform (Chicago Studies in American Politics)

The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform (Chicago Studies in American Politics)

David Karol, Hans Noel


Throughout the competition for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, politicians and electorate alike fearful that the end result may depend upon the personal tastes of unelected superdelegates. This quandary threw into reduction the present concept that—such surprisingly aggressive situations notwithstanding—people, instead of events, may still and do keep an eye on presidential nominations. yet for the earlier a number of a long time, The occasion Decides exhibits, unelected insiders in either significant events have successfully chosen applicants lengthy prior to electorate reached the poll box.

Tracing the evolution of presidential nominations because the 1790s, this quantity demonstrates how occasion insiders have sought due to the fact that America’s founding to regulate nominations as a way of having what they wish from executive. opposite to the typical view that the celebration reforms of the Seventies gave electorate extra energy, the authors contend that the main consequential contests stay the applicants’ fights for in demand endorsements and the aid of assorted curiosity teams and kingdom social gathering leaders. those invisible primaries produce frontrunners lengthy ahead of such a lot electorate commence being attentive, profoundly influencing ultimate election results and making an investment events with way more nominating energy than is mostly recognized.

Show sample text content

Download sample