The Gospel of Peter: Introduction, Critical Edition and Commentary (Texts and Editions for New Testament Study, Volume 4)
This booklet is significant serious research at the Gospel of Peter. It introduces and advances the most important debates encompass this article, it deals a clean scholarly version of the Greek textual content with text-critical notes, and it offers a entire observation at the textual content.
Figs.). that's 140/8 = 14.5. that's 113/6 = 18.83 (to four sig. figs.). 52 advent matches on each one line of the textual content of the Gospel of Peter. Representing such edition isn't consistently completely easy because the textual content has the occasional lucuna, additionally there are supralinear letters are inserted at issues and this is often coupled with a few sections the place it really is tough to learn the particular writing that's found in the manuscript. this can result in a few dispute approximately counting the particular letters.
‘doves’. The reconstruction keeps for the traces 7 and eight within the following type: Line 7 Line eight ]ἔσεσθε ὡς[ ἀρνία ἀνὰ μέ]σ̣ ον λύκων[ This reconstructs a announcing just like Matt 10.16a, yet areas it after the announcing that parallels Matt 10.16b. this is often additional advanced via the truth that whereas the combo of those sayings can be defined by way of attract their conjunction in Matt 10.16, P.Oxy. 4009 doesn't use the Matthean time period πρόβατα, however the Lukan time period ἀρήν. but Luke doesn't have.
One instance is especially instructive, considering that all through its narrative the 1st individual shape is utilized by Peter. A outstanding parallel exists among the Gospel of Peter 14.60 ἐγὼ δὲ Σίμων Πέτρος and the assertion in NHC VI.1 ‘And I, Peter, . . . ’323 therefore, whereas Peter conversing within the first individual within the Akhmîm textual content on events (7.27 and 14.60) might be suggestive if you happen to desire to establish this article with the Gospel of Peter pointed out via Serapion, still this is still a supposition.
And to consult him after the resurrection (14.60). might be the single implication to be drawn from the best way the identify is hired within the Gospel of Peter, except its restricted use as a reputation, is that disciples are associated with the Lord, Μαριὰμ ἡ Μαγδαλινὴ μαθήτρια τοῦ κ̅υ̅̅ (Gos. puppy. 12.50) and οἱ δώδεκα μαθηταὶ τοῦ κ̅υ̅̅ (Gos. puppy. 14.59). Head makes the statement that the name κύριος by no means refers back to the resurrected Jesus. He states, apparently, within the textual content as we now have it, κύριος by no means applies.
Gospel of Peter. this can be in marked contrast to such questions being requested of the canonical gospel, the Gospel of Thomas and different early Christian texts. All that may be said with simple task is that Eusebius believed (probably thoroughly) that Rhossos used to be a position have been a textual content referred to as the Gospel of Peter was once learn, and that a number of centuries later a textual content that could be principally exact with the textual content that Serapion encountered 548 For this sort of reasoning see Gardner-Smith, ‘The Gospel of.