Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation (Post-Contemporary Interventions)

Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation (Post-Contemporary Interventions)

Talbot J. Taylor


Do others comprehend what we are saying or write? can we comprehend them? Theorists of language and interpretation declare to be extra all in favour of questions about "what" we comprehend and "how" we comprehend, instead of with the logically past query "whether" we comprehend one another. An affirmative solution to the latter query is seemingly taken without any consideration. even though, in Mutual Misunderstanding, Talbot J. Taylor indicates that the sceptical doubts approximately communicational knowing do in reality have a profoundly vital, if as but unacknowledged, functionality within the development of theories of language and interpretation.
Mutual Misundertanding hence offers a strikingly unique research of the rhetorical styles underlying Western linguistic proposal, as exemplified within the works of John Locke, Jacques Derrida, Gottlob Frege, Jonathan Culler, Noam Chomsky, Ferdinand de Saussure, H. Paul Grice, Michael Dummet, Stanley Fish, Alfred Schutz, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Harold Garfinkel, and others.
This research unearths how, by means of the mixed impression of appeals to "commonsense" and anxieties approximately implications of relativism, scepticism has a picking function within the discursive improvement of the various highbrow disciplines making up the "human sciences" this day, together with serious conception, literary hermeneutics, philosophy of language and good judgment, verbal exchange concept, discourse and dialog research, pragmatics, stylistics, and linguistics. accordingly, this provocative examine might be of worth to readers from a large choice of disciplinary backgrounds.

Show sample text content

Download sample