History and the Dialectic of Violence: Analysis of Sartre's 'Critique De La Raison Dialectique'

History and the Dialectic of Violence: Analysis of Sartre's 'Critique De La Raison Dialectique'

Raymond Aron


From the preface:
The Critique, actually, constitutes a
kind of summa, because it bargains with the full frustrating that I
had yet in part thought of within the advent. It elaborates a
theory of realizing within the experience, following Dilthey and
Weber, that I had taken the time period. It offers with the boundaries of
the comprehensible or the intelligible, as Jaspers had performed for
psychology and Weber had performed for the research of social and
historical fact. It endeavours to complicated a typology of
practicc-oriented ensembles, or in different woi'ds, a typology of
the diverse modalities of reciprocal family members among the
individual and collectives, of different modes of integration
of collectives into consciousnesses and, inversely, of consciousnesses
into collectives. and at last, yet with no delivering the
sustaining argument, that is left to a moment quantity, the
Critique takes as an final aim the intelligibility of a single
History, which has a tendency in the direction of the basis of fact, or the
possibility of fact, from a totalizing of the changing into of man.
All the whereas Sartre follows the line that had led neo-Kantians
and phenomenologists to a opposite end: the extra that
understanding the previous expresses the historicity of the historian,
the extra it really is pointed out with the notion of a combination
of situations by way of the actor, and the fewer it avoids perspectivism.
It turns out to justify the another way trite formulation that
each new release and every epoch re-writes background. simply because the
future isn't but current, and since every one iteration and each
epoch supplies itself a unique earlier due to the destiny towards
which it really is orientated, it's the destiny that determines the current.

Show sample text content

Download sample