George Santayana's Marginalia: A Critical Selection, Volume 2: McCord-Zeller
quantity 2. Retail caliber PDF.
In his essay "Imagination," George Santayana writes, "There are books during which the footnotes, or the reviews scrawled by way of a few reader's hand within the margins, might be extra fascinating than the text." Santayana himself used to be an inveterate maker of notes within the margins of his books, writing (although smartly, by no means scrawling) reviews that light up, contest, or apparently extend the author's notion. those volumes provide a variety of Santayana's marginalia, transcribed from books in his own library. those notes provide the reader an strange standpoint on Santayana's lifestyles and paintings. he's through turns serious (often), approving (seldom), literary, slangy, frivolous, or even spiteful. The notes express his humor, his occasional outcry at a writer's folly, his problem for the niceties of English prose and the putting of Greek accessory marks.
These volumes checklist alphabetically through writer all of the books extant that belonged to Santayana, reproducing a range of his annotations meant to be of use to the reader or scholar of Santayana's proposal, his paintings, and his lifestyles. each one access encompasses a headnote with the author's identify, the name of the paintings, short ebook details, and the library place of the ebook. now not all marginalia from a given textual content is integrated; the notes were chosen for content material and style.
Santayana, frequently residing in solitude, spent loads of his time chatting with, and conversing again to, an excellent miscellany of writers, from Spinoza to Kant to J. S. Mill to Bertrand Russell. those notes rfile these conversations.
approach of nation regulate, to do all that with out actual ideals was once certainly a brand new departure. evaluate Hitler with Robespierre. George Santayana’s Marginalia 2:37 Isn’t all of it a kind of romanticism? yet there's additionally an old component of political strength or formativeness. Cf. Stalin. forty p 127, marked The disappointed interpretation of human nature has turn into the elemental universal conviction of contemporary political activism even though the particular programmes range. for that reason the decision to manage and, if.
Than the philanthropist who hates the entire most sensible works of guy, and loves simply infants. Kuno Meyer A German Grammar for colleges London: 1896. Waterloo. No marginalia. Michelangelo Buonarroti Rime e lettere Firenze: 1892. Georgetown. [No marginalia as such, yet Santayana collates different models and corrects typographical error to sonetto ii, iii, iv, vi, viii, ix, x; to madrigale vii; to sonetto xvii; and to madrigale xix, xx, and xxxiv.] John Stuart Mill Dissertations and Discussions New York:.
Imaginary ones assumed within the definitions. ? No “things” are equivalent. 38 p 153, marked ||Where conviction comes from. Infancy?|| Cf. Descartes & Locke 39 p a hundred ninety There are numerous methods utilized in arithmetic which require to be wonderful from Induction, being no longer unfrequently referred to as by means of that identify, and being up to now just like Induction safely so referred to as, that the propositions they result in are relatively normal propositions. for instance, once we have proved with admire to the circle undefined.
Marginalia from a specific textual content is numbered consecutively, by means of the web page number(s) and the other information about Santayana’s markings (‘marked’, ‘marked Z’, ‘underlined’, etc.) or placement (top, bottom). Santayana’s spelling and utilization is maintained all through; e.g., “every factor” (two phrases) for “everything.” He preferred British spelling after his stopover at to Frank Russell’s institution in 1887. Slips of the pencil are reproduced. His punctuation, which he knew to be doubtful in.
teacher there. His fullest learn of the Greek texts happened in the course of his place of dwelling in King’s university, Cambridge, in 1896–97. His Greek texts, in addition to his version of Jowett’s translation, are inscribed “King’s College,” and dated 1896 or 1897. From Santayana’s cross-references in Jowett, in addition to from his autobiography, we all know that he labored without delay from the Greek along with his instruct, Henry Jackson. He looks to have used Jowett sometimes to right Jowett or to crib from him. it really is.